AS62244 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS62244
Name
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Britain
Organisation
WTBTS-GBR
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2013-12-11
Network type
Non-Profit
Traffic levels
100-1000Mbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-WTBTS
PeeringDB
net/6688
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,642 3,992 20 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 63,200 1,798 8 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,203 18 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,121 185 19 CAIDA
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 24,952 590 1 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,730 64 3 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,658 48 6 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,805 45 2 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 2 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 202 23 2 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA 🇨🇭 CH 185 25 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 1 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 103 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 2 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 2 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.