AS63888 DATAWING LIMITED ππ° HK
DATA WING LIMITED. Announcing 61 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
61
15,616 (61 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS63888
- Name
- DATAWING LIMITED
- Organisation
- TISP LIMITED
- Country
- ππ° HK
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-11-18
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RADB::AS-63888
- Website
- http://www.tisp.com
- PeeringDB
- net/10999
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | πΊπΈ US | 56,082 | 1,721 | 176 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 54,635 | 240 | 2,199 | CAIDA |
| AS23764 China Telecom Global | ππ° HK | 46,926 | 181 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS4637 Telstra International Limited | ππ° HK | 42,362 | 669 | 155 | CAIDA |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | ππ° HK | 24,062 | 1,391 | 42 | inferred |
| AS4780 Digital United Inc. | πΉπΌ TW | 19,471 | 1,581 | 86 | CAIDA |
| AS4635 HKIX Route Servers | ππ° HK | 0 | 0 | 42 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 51,459 | 14 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom | π·πΊ RU | 26,708 | 85 | 54 | CAIDA |
| AS8359 MTS PJSC | π·πΊ RU | 20,683 | 456 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,181 | 45 | 58 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.