AS6391 Beanfield Technologies Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
6,400 (25 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
8
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS6391
Name
Beanfield Technologies Inc.
Organisation
Urban Networks Inc
Country
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2009-10-09
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-URBAN
PeeringDB
net/6841
Exchanges
2
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (50.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 2 no ROA (50.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 66,164 3,955 196 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 63,648 1,784 114 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,738 185 96 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 51,783 18 9 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 15,528 37 23 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,870 45 9 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί AU 569 201 22 CAIDA
AS22652 Videotron Ltee πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 109 151 9 CAIDA
AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 100 22 23 CAIDA
AS11814 Distributel Communications Limited πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 7 90 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS11831 eSecureData πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 3 52 276 CAIDA
AS54643 Idigital Internet Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 0 22 35 inferred
AS55124 E-Comm 9-1-1 πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 0 2 32 CAIDA
AS27232 Ooma, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 3 13 CAIDA
AS396005 New Westminster Public Library πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 0 1 11 CAIDA
AS12654 RIPE NCC - RIS πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 25 3 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.