AS6515 DACS-IX 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 14 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
10
70 × /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
13
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS6515
- Name
- DACS-IX
- Organisation
- DACS NX
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2019-08-29
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS6515:AS-DACSNX
- Website
- http://www.dacs-nx.com
- PeeringDB
- net/22730
- Exchanges
- 12
- Facilities
- 11
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,514 | 3,921 | 175 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,220 | 236 | 1,346 | CAIDA |
| AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth | 🇺🇸 US | 52,852 | 212 | 249 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,641 | 64 | 4 | inferred |
| AS13030 Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd. | 🇨🇭 CH | 314 | 69 | 13 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,774 | 45 | 32 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16557 Colo Solutions | 🇺🇸 US | 6 | 30 | 48 | CAIDA |
| AS19528 US Signal Company, L.L.C. | 🇺🇸 US | 2 | 16 | 425 | CAIDA |
| AS7124 DACS-IX | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 334 | CAIDA |
| AS7010 NELLICUS, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 6 | 322 | CAIDA |
| AS30622 Venable LLP | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 5 | 130 | CAIDA |
| AS203939 Mosaic Data Services, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 3 | 10 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.