AS6881 NIX.CZ z.s.p.o. 🇨🇿 CZ
Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
3
2,560 (10 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS6881
- Name
- NIX.CZ z.s.p.o.
- Organisation
- NIX.CZ, z.s.p.o.
- Country
- 🇨🇿 CZ
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1996-12-23
- Network type
- Non-Profit
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS6881:AS-NIX
- Website
- http://www.nix.cz
- Looking glass
- https://lg.nix.cz/
- PeeringDB
- net/657
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 10
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS29208 Quantcom, a.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 107 | 36 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS25512 CD-Telematika a.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 33 | 11 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS15685 CASABLANCA INT a.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 11 | 59 | 25 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,797 | 185 | 109 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,980 | 45 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS8218 Zayo Europe | 🇫🇷 FR | 336 | 19 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS29504 Freenet Liberec, z.s. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 0 | 1 | 18 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS44358 Kauno Technologijos Universitetas | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 5 | 47 | CAIDA |
| AS199670 DNS-Belgium VZW | 🇧🇪 BE | 0 | 4 | 23 | CAIDA |
| AS35052 ACONET | 🇦🇹 AT | 0 | 2 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS211655 NAUKOWA I AKADEMICKA SIEC KOMPUTEROWA - PANSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZY | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 1 | 3 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.