AS6908 Six Degrees Technology Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB

Announcing 48 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
43
113,152 (442 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
12 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
13
transit customers observed
Customer cone
14
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS6908
Name
Six Degrees Technology Group Limited
Organisation
Six Degrees - Datahop
Country
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2006-01-10
Network type
NSP
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Restrictive
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-DATAHOP
PeeringDB
net/837
Facilities
21

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

45 valid (93.8%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 3 no ROA (6.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS8220 COLT πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 48,666 153 630 CAIDA
AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 19,408 2,708 47 CAIDA
AS8426 Claranet Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 34 87 2,690 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS31220 Six Degrees Technology Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 13 549 CAIDA
AS25588 Six Degrees Technology Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 4 169 CAIDA
AS60228 Six Degrees Technology Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 2 152 CAIDA
AS199455 Virgin WiFi Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 3 124 CAIDA
AS39630 Asptech IT Solutions Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 9 104 CAIDA
AS44671 Skyline Networks & Consultancy Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 3 63 CAIDA
AS60914 Telecoms Consortium Ltd. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 1 43 CAIDA
AS33975 NetConsult Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 1 43 CAIDA
AS9140 Hyperneph Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 3 33 CAIDA
AS35551 TGL Services (UK) Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 3 29 CAIDA
AS60736 KOCHO GROUP LIMITED πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 3 20 CAIDA
AS53973 Freepoint Commodities, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 3 11 CAIDA
AS199828 NUSO CLOUD UK LIMITED πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 1 11 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.