AS7602 Sai gon Postel Corporation 🇻🇳 VN
Announcing 207 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
204
131,328 (513 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
1 × /32
Upstreams
10
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS7602
- Name
- Sai gon Postel Corporation
- Organisation
- Saigon Postel Corp.
- Country
- 🇻🇳 VN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2003-08-28
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-7602
- Website
- http://www.spt.vn
- Looking glass
- http://lg.spt.vn
- PeeringDB
- net/4596
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS45903 CMC Telecom Infrastructure Company | 🇻🇳 VN | 206 | 356 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS24088 Hanoi Telecom Joint Stock Company - HCMC Branch | 🇻🇳 VN | 41 | 105 | 920 | CAIDA |
| AS149107 TRUMVPS COMPANY LIMITED | 🇻🇳 VN | 22 | 9 | 351 | CAIDA |
| AS150895 EZ TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED | 🇻🇳 VN | 6 | 43 | 280 | CAIDA |
| AS45538 ODS Joint Stock Company | 🇻🇳 VN | 5 | 72 | 1,640 | CAIDA |
| AS152992 ONLINE DATA COMPANY LIMITED | 🇻🇳 VN | 4 | 2 | 1,532 | CAIDA |
| AS135918 VIET DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIABILITY COMPANY | 🇻🇳 VN | 3 | 71 | 2,656 | CAIDA |
| AS140825 Thien Quang Digital technology joint stock company | 🇻🇳 VN | 3 | 12 | 440 | CAIDA |
| AS135943 TRUONG MINH THINH TECHNOLOGY JOINT STOCK COMPANY | 🇻🇳 VN | 3 | 5 | 405 | CAIDA |
| AS63760 AZDIGI Corporation | 🇻🇳 VN | 2 | 5 | 156 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.