AS7668 Hokuriku Telecommunication Network Co. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP

Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
9
30,208 (118 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS7668
Name
Hokuriku Telecommunication Network Co.
Organisation
HTCN
Country
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP
RIR
APNIC
Allocated
1997-11-13
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-HTCN
PeeringDB
net/9832
Exchanges
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (90.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (10.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS2497 Internet Initiative Japan Inc. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 22,284 237 200 CAIDA
AS17676 SoftBank Corp. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 21,990 473 26 CAIDA
AS2516 KDDI Corporation πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 21,980 561 135 CAIDA
AS2519 ARTERIA Networks Corporation πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 137 182 62 CAIDA
AS17534 NSK Co.,Ltd. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 7 23 3 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,738 185 65 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 30,638 85 9 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,870 45 11 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 271 567 9 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS17932 Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 2 41 CAIDA
AS18123 INAOKI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 2 37 CAIDA
AS4711 INTEC Inc. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 20 22 CAIDA
AS24260 Board of trusty: Kinjo-Gakuen πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 1 5 CAIDA
AS24264 Kanazawa Institute of Technology πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ JP 0 1 4 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.