AS7896 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 8 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
7
209,152 (817 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
16 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
10
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS7896
- Name
- The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
- Organisation
- University of Nebraska
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 1997-02-10
- Network type
- Educational/Research
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS7896:AS-NU
- Website
- https://www.nebraska.edu
- PeeringDB
- net/9106
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,951 | 185 | 483 | CAIDA |
| AS11537 Internet2 | 🇺🇸 US | 2,236 | 23 | 109 | CAIDA |
| AS11164 Internet2 I2PX | 🇺🇸 US | 1,267 | 13 | 35 | CAIDA |
| AS7029 Uniti (fka. Windstream) | 🇺🇸 US | 683 | 2,823 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS15108 Allo Communications LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 37 | 57 | 266 | CAIDA |
| AS11317 Great Plains Network | 🇺🇸 US | 28 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS11714 Network Nebraska | 🇺🇸 US | 6 | 32 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS1252 University of Nebraska Medical Center | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 9 | 360 | CAIDA |
| AS397721 Apogee Telecom Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 95 | CAIDA |
| AS11546 The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 48 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.