AS8057 Vision Net, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 42 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
41
82,432 (322 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
13
transit customers observed
Customer cone
23
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS8057
Name
Vision Net, Inc.
Organisation
Vision Net AS8057
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
1997-03-26
Network type
Network Services
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS8057:AS-CUSTOMERS
PeeringDB
net/2645
Exchanges
1
Facilities
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 42 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,981 3,976 1,325 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 63,462 1,788 545 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,042 185 7,135 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6327 Shaw Communications πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 23,282 3,839 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6621 Hughes Network Systems, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 8 371 367 CAIDA
AS19605 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 3 29 871 CAIDA
AS33339 Nemont πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 2 123 1,578 CAIDA
AS40933 Triangle Communications πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 142 2,663 CAIDA
AS27022 Siyeh Corporation πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 11 517 CAIDA
AS1378 Interbel Telephone Cooperative, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 11 325 CAIDA
AS399079 Linctel Communications Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 6 282 CAIDA
AS3482 State of Montana πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 3 117 CAIDA
AS46971 First Interstate Bank πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 94 CAIDA
AS401920 Montana Outback Wireless Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 5 92 CAIDA
AS36046 BOTC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 78 CAIDA
AS6081 - 0 1 47 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.