AS8057 Vision Net, Inc. 🇺🇸 US

Announcing 32 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
31
79,872 (312 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
14
transit customers observed
Customer cone
24
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS8057
Name
Vision Net, Inc.
Organisation
Vision Net AS8057
Country
🇺🇸 US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
1997-03-26
Network type
Network Services
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
ARIN::AS8057:AS-CUSTOMERS
PeeringDB
net/2645
Exchanges
1
Facilities
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 32 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 67,533 3,892 1,307 CAIDA
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 65,666 1,909 792 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 57,327 241 5,435 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6621 Hughes Network Systems, LLC 🇺🇸 US 8 371 684 CAIDA
AS19605 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 3 29 855 CAIDA
AS33339 Nemont 🇺🇸 US 2 123 1,474 CAIDA
AS40933 Triangle Communications 🇺🇸 US 0 142 1,104 CAIDA
AS402710 Northern Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 0 11 505 CAIDA
AS27022 Siyeh Corporation 🇺🇸 US 0 11 504 CAIDA
AS399079 Linctel Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 0 6 276 CAIDA
AS1378 Interbel Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 0 10 271 CAIDA
AS3482 State of Montana 🇺🇸 US 0 3 114 CAIDA
AS46971 First Interstate Bank 🇺🇸 US 0 2 92 CAIDA
AS401920 Montana Outback Wireless Inc. 🇺🇸 US 0 5 90 CAIDA
AS36046 BOTC 🇺🇸 US 0 2 78 CAIDA
AS6081 - 0 1 45 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.