AS8491 Scientific-Production Enterprise Business Sviaz Holding LLC π·πΊ RU
Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
22,784 (89 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS8491
- Name
- Scientific-Production Enterprise Business Sviaz Holding LLC
- Organisation
- Business Svyaz Holding
- Country
- π·πΊ RU
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1997-10-03
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-BSH
- Website
- http://www.bsh.ru
- PeeringDB
- net/2364
- Exchanges
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 49,896 | 18 | 52 | CAIDA |
| AS57304 RETN Russia | π·πΊ RU | 24,731 | 6 | 48 | CAIDA |
| AS9049 JSC "ER-Telecom Holding" | π·πΊ RU | 24,615 | 40 | 60 | CAIDA |
| AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC | π·πΊ RU | 24,397 | 590 | 157 | CAIDA |
| AS28917 Fiord Networks, UAB | π±πΉ LT | 20,715 | 6 | 76 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 21,475 | 64 | 6 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,726 | 45 | 7 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS16047 Scientific-Production Enterprise Business Sviaz Holding LLC | π·πΊ RU | 0 | 2 | 82 | CAIDA |
| AS207479 Scientific-Production Enterprise Business Sviaz Holding LLC | π·πΊ RU | 0 | 2 | 82 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.