AS8664 University of Warsaw 🇵🇱 PL
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
8,192 (32 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
16,384 × /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS8664
- Name
- University of Warsaw
- Organisation
- University of Warsaw, ICM
- Country
- 🇵🇱 PL
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 1998-02-13
- Network type
- Educational/Research
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-ICM
- Website
- http://www.core.icm.edu.pl
- Looking glass
- http://lg.core.icm.edu.pl
- PeeringDB
- net/2312
- Exchanges
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS201054 Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie | 🇵🇱 PL | 17,218 | 0 | 2 | inferred |
| AS8501 Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Science, Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center | 🇵🇱 PL | 68 | 7 | 296 | CAIDA |
| AS29632 Netassist International EOOD | 🇧🇬 BG | 46 | 0 | 5 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,605 | 236 | 90 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,610 | 45 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS49559 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 139 | 11 | 1 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS209314 Akademia Sztuk Pieknych w Warszawie | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 2 | 94 | CAIDA |
| AS20555 Akademia WIT w Warszawie | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 2 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS15396 University of Warsaw | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 1 | 8 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.