AS8851 GCI Network Solutions Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB

Announcing 322 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
316
526,080 (2,055 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
20 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS8851
Name
GCI Network Solutions Limited
Organisation
Nasstar
Country
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
1998-06-23
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-GCICOM
PeeringDB
net/1297
Exchanges
3
Facilities
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

315 valid (97.8%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 7 no ROA (2.2%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 71,471 2,071 1,887 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,229 240 9,436 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 27,888 1 629 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 25,670 64 319 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 20,421 40 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,417 45 324 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 19,830 47 963 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 234 575 316 CAIDA
AS29169 GANDI SAS πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 48 8 314 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 33 97 318 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 16 7 322 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 324 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 9 39 322 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS8897 KCOM Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 2 0 30 CAIDA
AS29726 Vonage Holdings, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 38 CAIDA
AS31632 OAG Aviation WorldWide Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 1 34 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.