AS8879 DTS Systeme GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE

Announcing 8 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
33,792 (132 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS8879
Name
DTS Systeme GmbH
Organisation
DTS Systeme GmbH
Country
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
1998-07-08
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS-DTS RIPE::AS-DTS-V6
PeeringDB
net/1189
Exchanges
1
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

8 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 53,231 907 16 CAIDA
AS13237 euNetworks GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 341 30 252 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 44 0 4 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 2 inferred
AS56662 Marcin Gondek πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL 0 0 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,518 236 88 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,488 85 10 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,649 64 10 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,687 45 12 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 20,110 48 39 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 243 567 4 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 39 6 9 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 15 8 11 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 0 1 12 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS39077 Aschendorff Medien GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 0 2 74 CAIDA
AS12437 DTS Systeme Muenster GmbH πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 0 5 64 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.